Are you conscious of the fact that you are consciousness? If you are conscious, how do you know that you are conscious. The main argument for being conscious are the feelings and sensations of the body. What are these sensations? Life! The body is a conduit for life. What is life? Life is what empowers and animates the body. The life is not in the body. Life never leaves its source, and its expression has no limits. We are not just the life. We are consciousness. What is life? Life is a force that exists at its source and through each body simultaneously.

Life never leaves its source. Life is not created and life can never be destroyed. The sunlight I can see, is not the source of the sunlight. That daylight we see, never leaves the sun. What does this mean? It means that we must not confuse the effect with its cause. The effect is not the cause. There can be no effect without a cause. The body is not the life. Life is required for the birth and sustenance of the body. Every living thing in existence is empowered by life. What empowers life? When it comes to people, no individual is ‘one thing’.

The identity is a name on a birth certificate. In order to conform to society, the psyche of every citizen must be fractured. Therefore, in order to conform to society, we must compromise. The compromise is to deny our own natural expression, when and where it is forbidden. We do this by creating multiple selves, each competing for sovereignty over the mind. You are the host, creator and therefore god of these competing selves. One of the main problems with this kind of behavioural conformance is that the competing selves get in each other’s way.

What is good for one self, is not good for another. A fear of heights will keep us away from the edge of a cliff. However, a fear of heights isn’t much good if we need to climb a ladder. On a personal level, the creation of archetypal selves within the same mind can lead to what we currently term psychological problems. Poor management of our individual and collective mind, manifests as fears, inhibitions, impotence, neurosis, addiction, violence, crime and war. The personality of every person we meet is comprised of hundreds or thousands of component selves.

People are now encouraged to get tattoos, dentures, facial injections, breast implants (prostheses), spray tans in an effort to replace, enhance or improve what they perceive as self. People take steroids, have weight loss surgery, take weight loss pills and weight loss injections or undergo surgery to change their gender. People spray themselves with products designed to change their skin pigmentation. This reveals a form of judgement that encourages self-denial and ultimately a psychic fracture caused by self-hatred and a denial of God.

Genesis 1:27 (KJV) “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.” Psalm 139:13–14 (KJV) “For thou hast possessed my reins: thou hast covered me in my mother’s womb. I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made: marvellous are thy works; and that my soul knoweth right well.” Demonic concepts disguised as discernment judge the self, in order to destroy it. Mark 5:5 (KJV) “And always, night and day, he was in the mountains, and in the tombs, crying, and cutting himself with stones.

The fracturing of the psyche is an unavoidable and inevitable effect, caused by adaptation to any civilization that demands conformance. Romans 12:2 (KJV) “And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.” Denial of the true self is the price an individual pays for conformance to this world. What society refers to as a well-adapted personal psychology is someone who is prepared to make a ‘life-long’ compromise.

According to Jung, the solution to this internal conflict is individuation. The social contract requires each individual to regulate their behaviour, in order to sustain the systems required for survival, peace and health. This means that we must suppress any raw, natural unfiltered impulses, that are prohibited. This requires every person alive, to create specialized, context-dependent behaviours to be expressed in the workplace, family home, sports and in public institutions. Conformance requires us to replace our cohesive self, with a network of competing sub-personalities.

An effective mind control system, requires a single persona that channels the behaviours of one or more of these multiple personalities, when and where appropriate. If there is a single persona, the various dramatic mood and behavioural personalities are not easily detected. We must master the ability to ensure all behaviour is controlled by and expressed through one primary persona. It is then that we are considered to have adapted well to society. What happens if the multiple sub-personalities do not have a single representative?

What are the personalities? They are behavioural software applications. We can have an application for fighting, stealing, persuading others to buy from us, have sex with us, employ us, or follow our directions in a team meeting. We develop these sub-personalities (separate selves) for nearly all endeavours that require an ability that must be developed. It is however, important that there is only one single representative in charge of all forms of expression to ensure the individual doesn’t lose sovereignty over their own mind and succumb to mental illness.

If the multiple sub-personalities do not have a single representative, the changes in manifested personality, mood and behaviour will be noticeable to others. This may be defined using terms such as ‘schizophrenia’ or ‘multiple personality disorder’. A psychological complex may develop where the resources required for an undertaking are unacceptable to one or more of the other personalities. Without psychic regulation, the conflicting selves become autonomous and may compete to individually take control of their host’s mind, resulting in a psychiatric diagnosis.

The difference between someone with multiple personality disorder and someone considered to be healthy is how they manage their mind. The development of a single representative to manage the multiple selves we create is essential if we are to be managed and controlled by the authorities. This is why a name is placed on a census. When we accept the identity assigned to us, we create it in our own image. When we believe it is us, it is from this perspective that we develop understanding, skills and abilities. This is why a name is placed on the child’s birth certificate.

This is why religion claims to be the child’s identity, and why every child is educated. After a few generations the incarcerated mind edits its own DNA. When children become parents, they pass on this spiritual parasite, that possesses the minds of all children. Religion places an archetypal egoic identity (persona) on the child’s throne. Educators communicate with this identity in order to programme (educate) the whole mind (kingdom of heaven). The child’s development is controlled by authorities who spend years programming each child’s mind.

The whole mind is heaven. Without the faith (in beliefs) of the child, the authorities have no power over the child’s mind. In order to programme the child’s mind, the authorities must persuade the child to programme their own mind. Faith is the power of God given to man. Authorities obtain the child’s faith in their words, in order to trick the child into incarcerating itself. The child is potential. The institutions of society attempt to shape the developing personality through names, narratives, religion, moral concepts, laws, education, and social systems.

This is supported by the findings of psychological, sociological, and anthropological research. The birth certificate assigns the legal identity. Families, religions, governments, schools, and cultures then attach meanings, duties, values, and roles to that identity. Archetypal structures are how individuals understand themself. Ask a person who or what they are, and they may answer, I’m a Muslim, Christian, Jew, American, French, Vegetarian, etc. Some of these contextual selves are identified ‘incorrectly’ as moods. A change in mood can be noticed.

The change in mood is a change in self. If you see the persona as a games console. The console looks the same regardless which game you are playing. However, that console can play many different games. Try to imagine that the ego mind is like a console and the competing selves are different types of games with different skills, functions and forms of expression. If you inserted a game that allowed you to draw sketches, it is one form of expression. If you inserted a game that allowed you to kill the characters in the game it would be a contrasting form of expression.

These are different games, expressed through the same console. The same is going on with mood or behavioural changes. Different selves are being allowed to take ‘contextual’ control over the behavioural expression. Depending on how the mind is managed, this can lead to social success or criminal prosecution and incarceration. This can lead to addiction, violence, homelessness or it can lead to behaviours that are not only permitted, but rewarded. By closely observing behaviour, you can identify a change in the manifested self.

You notice these changes when an individual changes their situational/contextual environment. When someone is told good news, bad news, is the victim of crime, or confronted, they may suddenly lack the emotional resources they had seconds before, or become more assertive and resourceful. Historically, this has been explained as a mood change. If the necessary resources are not developed and a person finds themselves in a situation for which they do not have an appropriate self, they may recruit an inappropriate representative self to deal with things.

Violent people are people who have chosen to rely on aggression and violence to avoid having to develop appropriate psychic resources. In an economically controlled society, ability is rewarded, and those who have not developed their skills and abilities, are not. Most people develop multiple selves but aren’t aware of the specific methods they use to manage their own mind. In terms of behavioural expression, the self that is at work, is not the self that is at home, and the self that plays football on a Sunday morning is not the same self who attends church.

A man who will sing expletive laden songs at a football match, would not behave the same way when attending his own child’s school nativity play. The self that struggles to speak without slurring and cannot walk straight after drinking several beers, isn’t the self that is sober. The self that doesn’t wear makeup, is not the same self that spends over an hour putting on make-up before a night out. These separate selves are detectable in politicians who make promises they do not keep. The separate selves are detectable in soldiers before and after basic training.

The separate selves are detectable in those soldiers who kill in wartime, but do not kill in peacetime. In behavioural terms, we are not one thing. We adapt our behavioural responses according to the perceived demands of the situation. Some will simply avoid the situations they do not feel they can manage. A professional boxer is civilised outside of the ring, but extremely violent in it. The claim by each individual is that, in the context of I, their individual body’s perspective is unique. This is a fact! So, what is ‘I’?

I is the conviction of a unique personal existence. The evidence that I exist is my body. But the body is the fruit of others. It is an extension of the one life that has existed ‘uninterrupted’ all the way back to Adam. From the perspective of the body in which our individual awareness is now trapped, we claim that we have personal opinions, perspective, understanding, needs and wants. I’m not aware of when another body is hungry and needs to eat or tired and needs to sleep. The fact is that my perception is limited to the senses of my body and its environment.

The body is the only tangible piece of evidence for our existence. You can only count the number of people in a room. If there is a total of six people in a room, it establishes that there are not seven. What is the body? The body is a portal. The body is a literal, physical, three-dimensional portal. What are we? We are the life and awareness of the body. We are the source of life of the body detected by the medical professionals using various instruments. What are we? We are life? Where are we? We are at source. We never have and never can leave source.

We are the awareness of the body. The body is a bio feedback machine operated by a bio computer that we call a brain. When developing software, we must write code. Code is written using an integrated development environment (IDE). The mind is an integrated development environment. Technology establishes that we are omnipotent. All technology originates as an ‘idea’. Ideas are non-personal, non-local potential making itself known to the individual within their own mind. What is the mind? The mind is a portal to source.

What is source? Source is the collective unconscious where all things are possible. The collective unconscious is the mind of God. This world is a collective hallucination. The world each body inhabits is created in an integrated development environment called the mind. The perspective at source is all accepting. There is no need to create, or destroy, but those potentials exist. However, at source, they can only exist as potential. Source is like electricity. Until it empowers a light, a toaster, or factory production line, its dormant potential.

Everything that is perceived to exist from the perspective of the identity is an expression of source power. A leaf blowing on the ground is an expression of source power. An electric vehicle is an expression of source power. Technology is evidence of the mind’s ability to consciously harness source power to manifest ideas. A conversation in a restaurant is an expression of source power. The food we eat in the restaurant that is cooked in an oven, powered by electricity that is generated in a power station is evidence of our ability to harness source power.

The limits of source power do not exist. There are no limits to the expression of source. There are however, chronological limits to the life of the body in this three-dimensional realm. This is because we have created a three-dimensional realm that we have agreed is all there is in existence. This means we are placing limits upon the expression of source, which is unlimited. It is our understanding that is limited. It is our understanding that operates our mind. Our mind is the portal through which source is expressed.

If we have beliefs about difficulty, pain, poverty and suffering that we use to define self, they become lines of metaphorical code that work in ‘exactly’ the same way code works in an IDE. Our personal experience is the alchemical transmutation of our personal mind. Our life is a laboratory where we each engage in the development of what will become three-dimensional experience. Our mind is the petri dish where we experiment with different beliefs. Our life is the testing ground for the creations of our own mind.

We prove and disprove. From the perspective of this false and limited ‘I’, we individually create every belief, trauma and desire. Those who mismanage the wonderful instrument that is their own mind, will suffer. There is a universal fact that reveals the truth of the quality of life. That fact is that ‘every single emotional response is a perceptually induced neurochemical response’. The quality of life is how it feels. How it feels is caused exclusively by our perception of our self and everything that is perceived from that perspective.

This is why it was said: Matthew 7:1-3 (KJV) “Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?” That judgement is perception. Perception is how we individually see things. Education is an attempt by the authorities to create ‘generic perception’. Reality is a concept created by man to define what God created. Reality is Generic Perception.

Generic Perception = Reality. Generic perception was created by the dictionary. The dictionary was created to compete with the Bible for sovereignty over the minds of all believers. The dictionary now controls the perception of everyone on Earth. Everyone on earth, that can read is a believer, who believes that each word in the dictionary is what it was created to represent. Those words exist before a child learns to read, write and speak. It doesn’t matter if someone is illiterate. If they use words to communicate, their expression is controlled by the dictionary.

The bible is what was once referred to as the Good Book. The book of spells in folk tales and faery tales is a metaphor for the dictionary. The dictionary is literally the book of spells. When testing comprehension, the student is tested on their ability to ‘spell’ words. The book of spells did not usurp the word of God. Man’s faith delegated the word of God in favour of the book of spells. The most powerful words in the dictionary are concepts. The concepts of war, politics, economics, immigration, transgenderism have a particular fruit.

These concepts take possession of the minds of the believers who place their faith in them, becoming their opinion, their identity and controlling their words, likes, dislikes and behavioural expression. Once a dogmatic concept has control over the mind of a believer, their growth in understanding ceases. When two people who have invested their faith in opposing conceptual paradigms each claiming to be the only truth meet, there will be debate, disagreement or conflict and violence. If you must destroy the opposing view, it means that ‘you know’ their position is strong.

Devotion to beliefs and concepts that are unable to sustain their integrity beyond the limits of context, means that they are only contextually valid. Matthew 7:16-20 (KJV) “ Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.”

The natural evolution of archetypal identities, such as French, Irish or English is observed in generic behavioural expression. The reliance on stone, clay and coal, leads to stone masons, bricklayers and coal miners. Over time these behaviours influence the identity and the psyche of those who participate in those activities. However, the creation of political or religious ideologies that prescribe an archetypal identity, to which all must conform is an imposition that can cause life-long damage to the psyche.

Some individuals like open spaces. These may be the descendants of agricultural workers. Some may prefer to work down a mine. Some may like physical work and some may not. These preferences and intolerances reveal personal biases. We are not all the same. In the last 20 generations, more than one million people have contributed to our DNA. This gives each one of us a rich wellspring of traits that contribute to our efforts in life. When for example, the archetypal identity of a Communist is created, it may feel natural to some, but not to others.

In every jurisdiction, adaptation, integration and assimilation is expected. If those who visit a location refuse to integrate, the social structure will erode and a new unknown and untested community will replace it. For example, to force communism, Islam or diversity on a traditionally Christian community, will have a profound and devastating effect on the collective psyche of that community. In terms of personal traits and appearance, we are each the effect of the evolving collective DNA that we inherited. The letters of our DNA do not change.

However, those letters are nothing more than the observable markers of a cell. Within the same family, the height, eye colour, unique personal traits of each child are unique. Some may be introverted. Some may be extraverted. Some may be athletic and physical and some not. To impose a religion, ideology, laws and taxes on everyone within a whole community is coercive and extortionate. For example, some of the initial generations born into a mining community will find the demands of their fate to be spiritually detrimental. Others will easily adapt.

The creation of the concept and ideology known as Communism, forced all those within that jurisdiction to commit spiritual suicide or face potential genocide. The children and the children’s children of that generation would have been faced with what felt like an abrupt and unnatural life when born. When the individual chooses or is forced to live a life that feels unnatural to their personal temperament, they will begin to spiritually suffer. The way most people deal with this is to ‘toughen up’.

This approach may not be successful. Religions are man-made. In each generation the children born into the religion or within a jurisdiction that is controlled by a political ideology, will be expected to continue to managed those existential models. What is apparent is that the traits of each person are unique. The battle raging in the psyche between natural expression and permitted expression means that all-natural expression, that does not conform, must be denied or the individual will experience some form of ostracization, punishment or even death.

The archetypal identity of a Muslim, Christian, Democrat, Republican is egoic and unnatural. In all societies, everyone must be seen to embody the archetypal identity. Every archetypal identity is a behavioural model. The model is based upon a belief system. All belief systems are existential software. For the software to become operational within the mind of the believer, that believer’s faith and understanding is required. The way to persuade the individual believer that they must place their faith in those beliefs is to tell them that God created them.

If their moral, religious or legal obligations force the individual to deny their own natural expression, they will create and sustain spiritual conflict within their own mind. This conflict is a spiritual disease. The contemporary methods that deal with this spiritual conflict, are found in the fields of Psychiatry and Psychology. The spiritual conflict can manifest in an unlimited number of ways. The more common ones are violence, rape, crime, depression, fear, anxiety, phobias, addiction, promiscuity and self-denial (cosmetics, plastic surgery).

The psychologist deals with the effects of the conflict by defining them, using terms such as complexes. In spite of the rigid mental models within which the awareness of well adapted members of society are now trapped, there are some examples of natural expression of ability. Jesus, Srinivasa Ramanujan, Antonio Vivaldi, Leonardo Da Vinci, Michelangelo Buonarroti, Isambard Kingdom Brunel, Marie Curie, Nikola Tesla and Ada Lovelace are individuals who did not conform and were pioneers in their field.

This world is enforced by the persistent hallucination known as generic perception. Generic perception is now coded by the dictionary and spread through religion and education. Those who adapt and conform, experience a life of existential incarceration. All the religions, political ideologies and economic concepts are demonic. They were created to divide, conquer and control. Romans 12:2 (KJV) “And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.”

The evidence we rely on for our existence is our body. In this world, our field of vision is limited to the perspective of our body’s eyes. It is because of this fact, that we come to the conclusion that we are our body. We drink alcohol to have a particular type of experience and to feel a particular way. We become addicted to drink and drugs when and if those feelings transcend what our perception permits. However, the body like the drink, food and drugs is also just another medium for experience.

Regardless of the fact that alcohol and drugs are used, it is the particular and specific experiences (feelings) that our body feels that motivates or compels us to drink alcohol, ingest sugar and take drugs. It is the feelings of the body that we crave. It would not be possible to feel what the alcohol, food and drugs make us feel if the body could not create those neurochemical responses. What does this reveal? It reveals the fact that the body creates those neurochemical responses and is capable of creating them ‘without’ alcohol, sugar and drugs.

Why then, do we feel so low? We feel so low because of the emotional state that is created exclusively by our own perception. This is because every single emotional response ‘without exception’ is a perceptually induced neurochemical response. If we judge something to be boring, disgusting, exciting, interesting, fascinating, terrifying, then when our awareness is exposed to anything that our educated mind perceives in those terms, it triggers an immediate quid-pro-quo emotional reaction. We are the creators of the quality of our life. The quality of life is how it feels.

Your soul is not your identity. Your soul is not your body. What is conscious is the soul. What is aware is our soul. It has no reason and no objection. It is the life that is detected in the body. The body is a feedback mechanism, that pre-dates language. The body feels. When language was acquired, we distorted and replaced natural perception with educated perception. If each and every single emotional response is a perceptually induced neurochemical response, then it is my perception that determines the quality of my life.

The quality of life is how it feels. What is perception? Perception is how we see something. Perception is the words we use to describe and define what we are experiencing. There are implied questions we seem to be asking about everything and everyone we encounter. Is it good, bad, boring, interesting or complicated? Do I understand it or not? Is it easy or difficult? Perception is just ‘how’ we see what we see. Our perception is our understanding. Every argument reveals conflicting perception. History shows that how we see something can change.

What is needed for our perception to change? What we need is a change in our understanding. The only way our understanding can change is if we question it. We are programmed to perceive in generic terms that someone decided should replace what they were created to define and represent. We are told there is a universe and if we believe that this is a fact, we will never question it. We are told there are planets and if we believe this is a fact, we will never question it. We are told that we need fuel for propulsion and if we believe it, we never question it.

As long as the concepts that sustain generic perception remain unchallenged, the results we currently experience in all fields of endeavour will reoccur. For our life to improve, our understanding must transform. It is only by interrogating the integrity of every aspect of our understanding that our perception and therefore our life, transforms. The fact that you are reading this, means that your body is alive, but are you truly living? The mind is a miracle in the form of a technology. Our mind can achieve anything.

We alone have the authority, but not the wisdom to operate our own mind. This is because for at least two thousand years we have been domesticated to believe we are what we are told we are. The authorities of each jurisdiction have vicariously operated our unlimited mind by installing an operating system. The operating system is our given (unnatural) identity. The operating system is then controlled by a belief system. Each separate belief is a command that works in exactly the same way that lines of code operate the separate functions in a software application.

The world is a lie and the mind is corrupted. This is one of the reasons why it was said: Romans 12:2 (KJV) “And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.” We were each given free will, which means that our will is the will of God. If, however, we have a belief, then we have a bias, a line of code that rejects any and all alternatives. A mind that is controlled by this kind of dogmatic logic, imposes limits on its own understanding.

The identity is literally (not metaphorically) a software application, operated by a belief system (commands). There is a Christian software, Muslim software, Jewish software, Communist software, Socialist software, Diversity software, Homosexual software, Transgender software, warrior software, pacifist software. It is the embodiment of an archetypal identity that converts a coward into a warrior and vice versa. If I can persuade you to believe that I can and will destroy you if you oppose me, then I will have vicarious, contextual control over your volition.

If a Prime Minister terrifies a whole nation into believing that saying or doing particular things will get them cancelled, lose access to their bank account, lose their job and become professionally ostracised, he or she will have total control. If, however, the people of that nation wake up and lose all fear, and the fearful realise that they are fearless warriors, that nation will experience an immediate transformation. We embody what we focus on. If we focus on fear, we become fearful. If we focus on freedom our minds will be liberated.

If we hold ourself within the limits of limited knowledge and we defend those limits, our mind literally exiles and denies greater understanding. Only what we do not know can save us from the ignorance of dogma. We are not our religion. We are not our understanding. Our understanding grows by removing the limits that enforce it. Laziness is of the mind. Courage is of the mind. Cowardice is of the mind. The mind is controlled by software. Personal transformation is realised by focussing on what lies beyond the limits of our current understanding and ability.

These limitations are enforced by faith. That faith is placed in beliefs that exist in the context of ‘I cannot’. You can! What we believe we can do is a force that creates the power of expression. What we believe we cannot do is a force that creates the power of suppression. We each exist in a form of existential checkmate held between these two opposing forces. It is up to each individual to change the limits of what they can do, by removing their faith in all of the beliefs that exist in the context of ‘I cannot’ that now prevent us from achieving what we desire.

Those children who wish to have superpowers, do so because they believe that only super heroes have super powers. That belief is a limitation. It is a line of existential code written on the hard drive of their own mind, empowered by their own faith. Faith is the power of God given to man. Matthew 17:20 (KJV) “And Jesus said unto them, Because of your unbelief: for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder place; and it shall remove; and nothing shall be impossible unto you.”

The beliefs we invest our faith in, about self, can liberate us, or existentially incarcerate us. Beliefs can be presented by those we place our faith in, which promise all sorts of benefits, such as equality, free money, free housing, free education. Those who accept these apparent benefits are entering into a Faustian bargain. They are being bribed into self-incarceration within the limits of a mind that gives political allegiance to their benefactors. They become paupers, unable to independently sustain their selves and totally dependent on others.

Isn’t AI a more or less functional version of what we refer to as humans. Humans are self-replicating hardware, with a mind that is controlled by software. But within each human is a soul. A me! A conscience. Consciousness! Man’s software is ‘understanding’. The understanding of each individual is composed of lines of code that exists in the form of I-beliefs. The limits of our expression are enforced by ‘I-cannot’ beliefs and all form of expression are facilitated by ‘I-can’ beliefs. If we remove our faith in the ‘I-cannot’ beliefs, the limits of our expression expand.

The mind is a technology. The mind is the technology that operates the body. A copy of our source code is encoded into every cell. The authorities have used programming of the mind to ensure we do not realise that our mind has a source code that we have the power to develop, pervert or corrupt. Education is designed to programme the mind. It is accurate that the mind does not come with an operating manual. However, before slavery, serfdom and education, we didn’t need one.

The DNA is the body’s initial (source code) software. Even when the “hardware” (body) is damaged in an accident resulting in amputation, the core genetic instructions (the source code) remain intact. This is because it is present within every other cell within the body. The brain can be damaged. However, the concept of neuroplasticity confirms that the brain is a reconfigurable component. The brain is not a fixed “master chip.” The brain is the hardware, not the software. The brain is not the student. It is the instrument used by the student.

The brain is reactive. The brain is not proactive. The mind is both reactive and proactive. Fear is reactive, courage is proactive. The brain does not and cannot “decide” to learn. The body’s feelings are a feedback mechanism. It is this feedback mechanism that is being exploited by politicians, religious tyrants and those who have amassed weapons and armies that they threaten to use if they are not granted resource ownership or control. When we decide to focus our awareness on something, our brain reconfigures its physical and functional density.

Each belief indirectly creates what could be described as a contextually operated programmable logic controller. The brain cannot understand, but it can process. The purpose of religion and education is to programme the mind in order to convert the brain into a large language model and remove our ability to understand or question dogma or the motives for its creation. Our mind can understand and our mind can misunderstand. For example, I may look at a map that illustrates how to get from location A to location B. My perception replaces the map.

My perception is my understanding. Perception is personal judgement. Later when I embark upon the journey from location A to location B, I rely upon my mind’s understanding. If I arrive at location B without getting lost, it reveals that I have made a carbon copy and my perception is correct. If, however, I get lost it reveals that my perception does not match the map. Getting lost reveals that I lack understanding. The only thing a mind can lack is understanding. This can only expand by questioning everything we believe and everything we claim to know.

A translation (subjective) of the Bhagavad Gita, Chapter 6, verses 5–6: “One must elevate oneself by one’s own mind, not degrade oneself.” How we use our mind, or who or what we allow to dictate its understanding, determines if our mind is a friend, or an enemy of the self. When we conquer our mind, it becomes a friend and an ally that is unmatched in its power and ingenuity. It’s ingenuity, and its capability is unlimited. It can empower us or fearfully incarcerate us. Its ultimate gift is its power. How we use that power, determines if it is courage or fear.

If we do not take back sovereignty and control over our own mind, it can become and remain our greatest enemy. Proverbs 25:28 (KJV) “He that hath no rule over his own spirit is like a city that is broken down, and without walls.” God is real and created us in his own image. This means we have the power of God. We are the personal God of our mind. We have forgotten ‘what’ we are and allowed others to insert a software programme within our mind That software is the ‘identity’. We have allowed all manner of demonic concept to become lines of code in our mind.

Contemporary science and corrupted religions have accepted demonic concepts that seek to usurp God. Once we believe in these concepts, they dictate what we believe and what we imagine. But not one of these concepts and satanic ideologies can usurp God. With faith, they can however, usurp the believer. 2 Corinthians 10:5 (KJV) “Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ”

Life from the perspective of someone who is educated (programmed) includes the knowledge of the concepts of finance, poverty, economics and taxation. We have God and we have the alternatives. We have psychologists, politicians, educators, religious ministers and corporations each offering a solution to perceived problems. For a religious person, if just one of those solutions is an alternative to God, then they have two competing influences within the same mind. If one is accepted, the other is denied. James 1:8 (KJV) “A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.”

All beliefs are literal prayers and all prayers are answered. This is why we must question and if necessary, withdraw our faith in any belief that exists in the context of ‘I cannot’ unless it is a belief that ensures that we do not break a commandment of God. In existential terms, we are self-programming software. Matthew 26:41 (KJV) “Watch and pray, that ye enter not into temptation: the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak.” Henry Ford is credited with the following quote: “Whether you think you can, or you think you cannot—you’re right.”

We are irresponsibly and unconsciously creating self-limiting beliefs, without understanding the fact that they establish absolute limits on our volition. A belief that I cannot learn, is a command to my own mind to prevent me from acquiring the necessary understanding for learning. From this moment our mind creates perceptually induced neurochemical responses (unpleasant emotions) each time we are exposed to learning material. From this moment forward, we may refer to the subject matter as boring, difficult or impossible to learn or understand.

Not all self-limiting beliefs are sins, but many are. Any belief that enables us to achieve things by breaking a commandment (lying, stealing, adultery, murder) is a sin. Therefore, we only need ten (10) self-limiting beliefs which were compassionately created to establish volitional limits upon our unlimited expression, in order to protect others. When an individual invests their faith in beliefs that have contextual integrity, they may unwittingly create conflict in other contexts. They then experience what they may define as problems and difficulties.

Any beliefs that are defined using the words ‘I can’t’ reveals a faith-based limitation. Every belief is a line of code. Any instruction to the mind (belief) that contains the words ‘I cannot’ or ‘I can’t’ establishes, the faith-based limits an individual has placed upon their own mind’s volition. Our technological development illustrates that the mind is capable of achieving far more than our body. This is because the body has physical limitations. We cannot fly, but we can create flying machines. We can’t swim thousands of miles but we can build ships with propulsion systems.

The body perceives differently to the mind. A fall from a ladder can result in injuries. The pain is caused by the impact of the fall. Physical pain is not emotional pain. Every single emotional response ‘without exception’ is a perceptually induced neurochemical response. For example, a man may get bitten by a stray dog and instantly create the belief that all dogs could potentially bite. He may forget what he chose to believe, even when he has a phobic response around other dogs.

If this phobia prevents him from leaving his house or forces him to walk in the opposite direction of dogs in order to avoid them, then it has a detrimental effect on the quality of his life and his freedom of movement. The man may begin to change his perception if exposed gradually to the thing he fears. One method is to use what is known as the subjective unit of disturbance (SUDs) scale. This may result in the man feeling more comfortable around dogs, or completely losing his fear of them.

The key to understanding the fear or phobia is to allow the person to explain in their own words why they fear what they fear. This will through thorough interrogation, reveal a number of beliefs. Beliefs are like branches on trees, that over time create sub-branches, twigs and sprigs, all being beliefs that are created to support the original belief. A fear of dogs, may be supported by the belief that dogs are allowed into pubs and so pubs are avoided (feared). It is important to identify the genesis of any perception that enforces limitations on volition.

It is also essential to understand the role that faith plays in the creation, acceptance or rejection of beliefs. It is also important to understand that the individual is never having a relationship with an objective reality. Reality is generic perception and as we have previously established, generic perception is created and sustained by the words in the dictionary. What is the individual’s mind generating in the brain, to create the appropriate pre-programmed emotional response, for each and every experience? Their brain neurochemically (emotionally) responds to their own mind’s perception.

When it is spoken, perception like truth is never universal or objective. A person who fears dogs does not perceive dogs in the same way as someone who does not fear dogs. A wise man and a fool can both speak truthfully and give completely different testimonies, regarding their perception as witnesses of the same event. If perception was fixed and dogmatic, the development of new technologies would not be possible. Just as one bad experience can create a fear or phobia, one good experience can create an addiction. The sensations of the body are temptations.

We can manipulate our body to generate those sensations through food, drugs, cigarettes, alcohol, sex and exposure to online visual stimulus. Addiction is a shift from mind to body. This is a sin because the mind must not become a slave to the visceral feelings of the body. We must realise that we each have dominion over our own mind. The mind has the ability to create every kind of feeling. When defined each of those mind-made feelings are called emotions. We must realise that how we perceive something determines our emotional response to it.

Every single emotional response is a perceptually induced neurochemical response. We can be attracted to, disgusted by, interested in, intrigued by or terrified of ‘anything’. What determines how we emotionally respond to anything and everything is ‘how’ we perceive it. This implies that if we change our perception, we change the quality of our life. The quality of life is how it feels. What our perception reveals is what we believe or what we know. If we are miserable and sad, depressed and suicidal it means that our perception of self is self-destructive.

If we have self-perception that makes us depressed, unhappy and miserable, then we will feel this way. This is because every single emotional response ‘without exception’ is a perceptually induced neurochemical response. The transformation of our minds requires a methodology. That methodology is the removal of all faith in all beliefs that perceive self in detrimental terms. The power of every belief is the faith it obtains. But once we change what we believe, we change how we perceive. Forgiveness is a change in our perception regardless of the evidence.

If we simply sustain our self-diminishing beliefs, such as I’m not good, I’m ugly, I’m fat, nobody will love me, we literally write lines of existential code within our mind, that programme our perception of ‘self’. This compels the behaviours and feelings that create and reinforce those beliefs. This makes anyone who has this kind of psychological model running in their mind, susceptible to drug and alcohol addiction, self-harm, social isolation, obesity and anti-social and violent behaviour. The only thing a mind can lack is understanding.

When an unhappy person is exposed to alcohol, drugs or someone who they think can save them or make their lives better, they can become addicted. The addict may then become or recruit someone who is co-dependent. This can lead to a life of addiction. An addict is someone who experiences a shift from mind to body. This is where the mind becomes a slave to the cravings of the body. This allows the cravings of the body to override the mind’s social survival processes. The mind is the only technology that everyone on Earth must learn to operate.

Religion and education compete with us for sovereignty over our mind, carefully concealing the fact that our sovereignty can never be taken from us. We can however, be tricked (educated) into believing that we need to be educated. Education and religion have been used by the authorities of the world to obtain vicarious control over each mind’s perception. If you are not in control of your own life, it is because you are not in control of your own mind. The mind is a subtle form of the body and the body is a denser form of the mind.

The body (effect) is how the mind (cause) is expressed. The mind is the point where expression and potential expression meet. All behaviour is an expression of mind. The development of the mind’s understanding is demonstrated by their expression. The objective of life is to realise that we are unlimited potential giving life to the body we inhabit. ‘I’ exist, but in the moment, I define I, I am replaced with whatever I define I to be. This is the paradox of every identity. When we associate with one thing, we deny all other things.

If we viewed the body as technology and nothing more, then we would understand. A sailing boat, is not a passenger yacht. A glider is not a supersonic jet. If our mind had the same devotion to technology that we now have for our archetypal identities, it wouldn’t have discovered fire, wheels, electricity, transportation or digital technology. It’s only by questioning the dogmatic limitation of every proposed truth that we transcend it. If it is absolute, then it can sustain any challenge. If it is not then it will be replaced with greater understanding.

There are four main religions in this world. In chronological order, there is Hinduism, Judaism, Christianity and Islam. The body is a feedback mechanism used to develop the mind. When the mind is sufficiently developed by the responses (physical/emotional) of the body, the body is no longer required. When we worship and crave specific feelings, we become addicted and our mind’s development ceases. An addict is someone who has allowed the cravings, weaknesses and addictions of their body to usurp their own mind.

Addiction is the self-conquering the self. Salvation refers to the self, using their own mind to consciously save the authentic self from the conditioned (educated) mind of the unconscious self. The cause of all suffering is a belief! Heaven is the whole mind. The mind descends into hell, when it allows the body and its cravings to dictate the functioning of the mind. Conscious or not, the mind controls the behaviour of the body. We can either consciously control the expression of our own mind or unconsciously be controlled by the body’s greed, cravings and lust.

If you want to stop using drugs but cannot, it is because you have given your body dominion over your mind. You have done this to obtain or mask certain feelings that you wish to replace. We must face what it is we feel we cannot deal with. We must understand that if every single emotional response without exception is a perceptually induced neurochemical response, then we must identify what it is we are avoiding and why. Whatever that is, is our version, our perception. It is by realising that we alone must do the work, that we end our addiction.

If we are simply avoiding the comparative lows of being sober, then we need to review how we perceive our self and normality. Gratitude is a force that ensures we are not tempted by what we do not have. If we are ungrateful then we are a prime candidate for consumption of anything we perceive to be better. It is through self-inquiry that we reduce the variance between how we feel when sober, compared with how we feel when high. To perceive the peace of God as boring, is to deny it.

If you are bored, it is because you have chosen to do nothing with the opportunity that you call life. Boredom is the state of a consumer. A consumer uses external stimulus to feel better. They do this through spending, eating, drinking, watching content and taking drugs. However, using anything that is not the self to make the self feel better can lead to dependency. When we decide some feelings are better and some feelings are worse, we create a desire for particular feelings. We do everything for the feeling. If you want to be happy, create a happy life.

If you want to be happy without doing the work, at some point you’re likely to become addicted. This is when the feelings of the body take sovereignty over the mind. How is this possible? The body obtains dominion over the mind when we place our faith in an ‘I-Cannot’ belief. I cannot stop is the mantra of an addict. I cannot learn, is the mantra of the ignorant. I cannot fight is the mantra of a coward. Mismanagement of the mind creates addicts, ignorance and cowardice. To place our faith in ‘I cannot’ beliefs without discernment, can destroy our life.

Good and bad, are potential forms of personal expression. If you want to create a ‘good’ world then be a good person. The promise of governments and politicians, is that they can save us, but this is impossible. Who do they call on to fight their battles? Who do they tax? Who do they blame? In 1913, Gandhi wrote in his weekly newspaper, Indian Opinion, published on September 13, 1913: “If we could change ourselves, the tendencies in the world would also change. As a man changes his own nature, so does the attitude of the world change towards him.”

Ghandhi’s life is evidence that he literally walked his talk. In terms of each and every experience we have put me over we. Wanting more than others is the desire to put self above others. Wanting to be famous is the desire to put self above others. Wanting others to change reveals a personal reluctance or refusal to change. If the world you live in is unfair and you feel abandoned it is because you have abandoned the world. We are encouraged to be rich, talented, famous and special. We are encouraged to build a following. We are encouraged to become influencers.

Whilst it may not be apparent, many sponsors who reward the biggest influencers, are really buying the right to censor those influencers. If you are an influencer and you censor your testimony for money, you have sold your integrity. If you could say one word that would liberate one single mind, but do not, because the financial funnel will cease, then you know where your loyalty lies. Most people in this world are controlled by fear. The ultimate fear is fear of death. John 15:13 (KJV) “Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.”